🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a fundamental right. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that authorities grant or withhold as they see fit. This represents the underlying meaning of new regulations that the ruling administration is advancing, which would determine when and where demonstrations can take place, with possible prison sentences for those who disobey these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous governments had already undermined this essential right: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which international human rights organizations had condemned as "significant and undue limitations" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these progressive assaults on liberty have practically abolished the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Tragedy to Justify Suppression

The latest restrictive measures are being justified by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a Manchester Islamic center. There should be widespread consensus that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, employing this horrific incident as a pretext to suppress opposition is not only unrelated to that duty but distorts it.

"When you can't set boundaries at mass killing, you probably can't establish limits at democracy," observed a prominent American author, a statement that rings true for the present administration.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's rich history of protest and activism against racial discrimination and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were branded as radicals in their time, even while they were advocating the rights of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In the current complex situation, here's what's truly occurring: Israel – a foreign state – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have characterized as genocide. Its warfare have prompted the International Criminal Court to release legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

Western popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens believe Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would support a total prohibition on arms sales to the nation, and back the arrest of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially failed the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to try to silence a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this attempt. Government officials have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to continue.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been labeled as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish identity with the policies of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been rightly questioned for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a situation where police authorities can suggest that protests opposing Israel's actions should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have stated that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in supposed mistreatment faced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from two years of ongoing violence that have taken tens of thousands of human lives. British politicians and media outlets have barely concealed the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest expressions of discrimination in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a dangerous threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused direct action organization. Thousands of British protesters have been detained, mostly for holding placards opposing genocide and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; among them a former clergyman and the child of a World War II genocide survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "linked with" other nations, while the sitting leader characterized such protests as antisemitic. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to control dissent. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors struggled, suffered and sacrificed their lives to establish our freedoms. We may eventually rue how casually we permitted them to be eroded.